Project 365

Week 24 | 366.2016

I had a bad photography day today. I got the film scans back that are making it possible for me to get my 365 photos caught up and posted, and they were not very good. They were very bad. It was three rolls of film all shot on my Pentax 645N, and I had only shot one roll on that camera prior to these. The feedback email from The FIND Lab said something like, "exposure on these rolls was great! But there seemed to be focus issues throughout..." And then I looked at the three rolls in disbelief that they could be so bad. So many out of focus photos. And beyond that, so many photos of the same things I have been taking photos of over and over and over. I know it is part of experimenting with film stocks and cameras and trying to figure things out, and it is true that my emphasis needs to be on nailing exposure and not as much on composition. But yes, just a bunch of photos where focus fell on something random, and that wouldn't have been very good even if they had been in focus. After I sat there looking at them for a while, I remembered that there was a reason that the photos were out of focus, and that I had anticipated it would happen, but forgot. I shot most of those three rolls using the three point focus mode on the Pentax instead of the single point focus mode. I won't go into the long explanation for why three points isn't actually better than one, but I figured out that for my needs, I need to be on single point focus. The other thing is that I shot at 2.8, wide open, fairly often. And that is different on a medium format camera than on a full frame camera. I need to hang around F4 if I want to improve my chances for getting things in focus. The lens I have for the camera, the FA 75mm 2.8, has some limitations, and another lens might work better for the way I shoot (especially indoors). The 75mm lens has a minimum focusing distance of two feet- indoors, that makes it hard to take detail shots or to frame things the way I am inclined to. My next scans come back early next week, and hopefully they will be better. I would feel better about investing in an additional (inexpensive) Pentax lens if I could get a roll back from that camera that knocks my socks off.

If they aren't great, that is ok too. Right now, the process of learning film is the only thing I am focusing on. So the quality of my photos is going to be worse for awhile. Then I will start a light class, and that will be where I put my energy (probably still shooting a lot of film), and maybe things will get better. In mid-July, I will start a flash class, and I expect that may cause things to take quite a dive. You never know though, maybe I will be amazing with artificial light. Tonight, just to get back on solid footing, I took my Nikon D750 outside with my macro lens for some no messing around regular old late evening flower shots. I had to make sure I still remembered how to do that. That is my therapy!

2016-06-22_0001
2016-06-22_0001

And tomorrow... back to film.

Here are my shots for week 24.

162/366 Pentax 645N, Ektar 100
162/366 Pentax 645N, Ektar 100
163/366 Fuji X-T1
163/366 Fuji X-T1
164/366 Pentax 645N, Ektar 100
164/366 Pentax 645N, Ektar 100
165/366 Pentax 645N, Portra 160
165/366 Pentax 645N, Portra 160
166/366 Fuji X-T1
166/366 Fuji X-T1
167/366 D750
167/366 D750
168/366 D750
168/366 D750

Week 22 | 366.2016

When I started taking a film class, I quickly realized that there were definitely going to be days when I would only be shooting film. Most days I do pick up my digital camera at some point, but with the amount of film I am shooting for the workshop I am taking, sometimes that is the only photography I am going to do in a day. And of course that is fine, it just means that before I can post the seven photos I took for the week, I have to wait for the scans to come back. For the black and white film I shot for this week, the lab I chose was Photovision. While I was really happy with a lot of the photos, I wasn't happy with the way they were scanned. Everything came back looking very, very matte, which I am not a fan of. I chose these film stocks based on their contrasty characteristics (Fuji Neopan Acros 100 and Ilford HP5 400). Initially I thought that the photos just looked like that because they are film, but the feedback I got in class is that they shouldn't look that matte. Either it is the way the lab scanned it, or I had exposure issues they were trying to correct and the matte is the result of that. I am waiting to hear back from them to see what they have to say. The photos are easy to fix in Lightroom, just by adding back the missing black and adding a little clarity. I am now waiting on five color rolls of film that I sent to FIND, and I am very, very excited to see the results of those. One of those rolls I shot with my new to me Pentax 645N- a camera that I am OVERJOYED to have, but the purchase of it made me feel guilty. As a result, I returned the Fuji 90mm lens I had just purchased. I loved the lens, but without question I wanted the Pentax more. In reality, neither of the items is very "practical", and I plan to make a very practical lens purchase in the next week or so that is going to be very painful financially. And very heavy. But perfect for my current needs and long term goals. A 70-200, either the Tamron or Nikon version.

Here are my photos for the week. I think that they look very different from my usual photos, both because of the inclusion of film, and just because. We took my son to his first movie, so I had to include a photo of him in the theatre. Even though it wasn't my "best" photo of the day. The sky photo, well, it was seriously the most amazing sky I have ever seen. I had to try to capture the magic of it, somehow. And while you really did have to be there, and I should have shot at ISO 100 on a tripod, I hope you get the idea. And my girls are very, very into cooking lately. They like to help with cooking things, and they create things on their own, and want to try to make plans to prepare family meals by themselves. So the photo is of them eating the banana concoction that they created and felt very proud of.

148/366 F100/ Acros
148/366 F100/ Acros
149/366 D750
149/366 D750
150/366 D750
150/366 D750
151/366 X100T
151/366 X100T
152/366 X100T
152/366 X100T
153/366 F100/ Acros
153/366 F100/ Acros
154/366 Fuji XT1
154/366 Fuji XT1